Saturday, July 23 2016 @ 11:02 PM UTC  
Home  :  Advanced Search  :  Site Statistics  :  Story Archives  :  My Account  :  Contact Us  :  Help    
The Kick Them All Out Project

The IRS and Congress Both Hold Our Liberty in Contempt




Posted  4-6-2015









 

Law Lets I.R.S. Seize Accounts on Suspicion, No Crime Required



By Shaila Dewan
NYTimes.com
October 26, 2014



ARNOLDS PARK, Iowa — For almost 40 years, Carole Hinders has dished out Mexican specialties at her modest cash-only restaurant. For just as long, she deposited the earnings at a small bank branch a block away — until last year, when two tax agents knocked on her door and informed her that they had seized her checking account, almost $33,000.

The Internal Revenue Service agents did not accuse Ms. Hinders of money laundering or cheating on her taxes — in fact, she has not been charged with any crime. Instead, the money was seized solely because she had deposited less than $10,000 at a time, which they viewed as an attempt to avoid triggering a required government report.

“How can this happen?” Ms. Hinders said in a recent interview. “Who takes your money before they prove that you’ve done anything wrong with it?”

The federal government does.

Using a law designed to catch drug traffickers, racketeers and terrorists by tracking their cash, the government has gone after run-of-the-mill business owners and wage earners without so much as an allegation that they have committed serious crimes. The government can take the money without ever filing a criminal complaint, and the owners are left to prove they are innocent. Many give up.


Will This Be Americas Future Too?



By John W.Wallace
The PPJ Gazette
September 3, 2012

COLLECTIVIST TYPE GOVERNMENTS HAVE RESULTED IN A LOSS OF FREEDOM AND VERY HIGH TAX RATES IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: WILL THIS BE AMERICA'S FUTURE TOO?

Have you ever wondered what the real cost of those proposed socialist programs are going to be – once most of the programs of the Democrat-Collectivists are fully implemented in the United States, against the will of the American


people of course. Have you ever wondered what your quality of life will be once these costs finally hit your wallet. If you have wondered about it, you may be very interested in looking at the current tax rate figures for the European Union.

As you look these mind-boggling, very high tax rates, keep in mind that in spite of these astronomical figures, these European countries are still not able to finance their social engineering and social welfare programs exclusively from tax revenues. Just about all of the European countries are also deeply mired in public debt of gargantuan proportions. Greece has reached the point where its debt is so huge it is in imminent danger of defaulting. That is the reason the European economic community has intervened to bail them out yet again.

If you’re following the international financial news, you know Spain and Portugal are right behind Greece.

Thanks to our current administration and the many Democrat-Collectivists and Liberal-Republican administrations and politicians who came before, the United States is now heading right down the same path. Surely, both political parties can share the blame.

The VAT tax named in the table is the national sales tax that Europeans pay and that kind of a tax is exactly what you can expect to see the Obama administration proposing after the fall elections, if they win. This will be on top of the U.S. federal income tax.


IRS Travel Ban: Revoking Citizenship By Stealth



Provision that allows feds to suspend passports of accused tax delinquents expected to pass Congress

By Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet.com
April 16, 2012

Efforts to pass a bill that would allow the IRS to deny travel rights to U.S. citizens who the feds merely claim owe $50,000 or more in delinquent taxes represents a de facto move to revoke the citizenship of Americans without due process and in complete violation of the Constitution.

IRS Travel Ban: Revoking Citizenship By Stealth 57 46.main

Thanks to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a recently passed Senate bill, the suitably Orwellian entitled ‘Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act’, includes a provision that allows the federal government to revoke passports of Americans accused of owing back taxes.

The legislation now moves to the Congress where, despite a Republican majority, the IRS provision is expected to be retained in the final version of the bill because it will raise an estimated $750 million dollars over ten years.

“There is no requirement that the tax payer be guilty of or even charged with tax evasion, fraud, or any criminal offense — only that the citizen is alleged to owe the IRS back taxes of $50,000 or more,” reports the Daily Economist.

Empowering the IRS to deny fundamental rights on a whim is completely illegal and unconstitutional.


Video: Aaron Russo's "America Freedom to Fascism



This is film is the great gift of the late Aaron Russo, a film that exposes the absolute and utter fraud of the Internal Revenue Service, one of the most ruthless terrorists organizations on the face of the planet.

House Health-Care Proposal Adds $600 Billion in Taxes and Cuts $400 Billion in Medicare and Medicaid



By Laura Litvan
Bloomberg

Health-care overhaul legislation being drafted by House Democrats will include $600 billion in tax increases and $400 billion in cuts to Medicare and Medicaid, Ways and Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel said.

Democrats will work on the bill’s details next week as they struggle through “what kind of heartburn” it will cause to agree on how to pay for revamping the health-care system, Rangel, a New York Democrat, said today. The measure’s cost is reaching well beyond the $634 billion President Barack Obama proposed in his budget request to Congress as a 10-year down payment for the policy changes.

Asked whether the cost of a health-care overhaul would be more than $1 trillion over a decade, Rangel said, “the answer is yes.” Some Senate Republicans, including Senator Orrin Hatch of Utah, say the costs will likely exceed $1.5 trillion.

House Democrats plan to release their legislation next week. Obama is working with Congress to get legislation to his desk by October.

31 Questions and Answers About the Internal Revenue Service - Page 2



 28. Can the IRS levy bank accounts without a valid court order?

Answer: No. The Fifth Amendment prohibits all deprivations of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. Due Process of Law is another honored and well developed feature of American constitutional practice. Put simply, it requires Notice and Hearing before any property can be seized by any federal government employees, agents, departments or agencies.

A levy against a bank account is a forced seizure of property, i.e. the funds on deposit in that account. No such seizure can occur unless due process of law has first run its course. This means notice, hearing, and deliberate adjudication of all the pertinent issues of law and fact.

Only after this process has run its proper or “due” course, can a valid court order be issued. The holding in U.S. v. O’Dell, 160 F.2d 304 (6th Cir. 1947), makes it very clear that the IRS can only levy a bank account after first obtainin


31 Questions and Answers About the Internal Revenue Service



Revision 3.5
certified by
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
Citizen of California, Federal Witness,
Webmaster of the Supreme Law Library
Internet URL of home page: http://www.supremelaw.org
Internet URL of this file: http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm
Common Law Copyright.  All Rights Reserved without Prejudice

 
1. Is the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury?

Answer: No. The IRS is not an organization within the United States Department of the Treasury. The U.S. Department of the Treasury was organized by statutes now codified in Title 31 of the United States Code, abbreviated “31 U.S.C.” The only mention of the IRS anywhere in 31 U.S.C. §§ 301‑310 is an authorization for the President to appoint an Assistant General Counsel in the U.S. Department of the Treasury to be the Chief Counsel for the IRS. See 31 U.S.C. 301(f)(2).

At footnote 23 in the case of Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979), the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that no organic Act for the IRS could be found, after they searched for such an Act all the way back to the Civil War, which ended in the year 1865 A.D. The Guarantee Clause in the U.S. Constitution guarantees the Rule of Law to all Americans (we are to be governed by Law and not by arbitrary bureaucrats). See Article IV, Section 4. Since there was no organic Act creating it, IRS is not a lawful organization.
 
2. If not an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury, then what exactly is the IRS?

Answer: The IRS appears to be a collection agency working for foreign banks and operating out of Puerto Rico under color of the Federal Alcohol Administration (“FAA”). But the FAA was promptly declared unconstitutional inside the 50 States by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of U.S. v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 287 (1935), because Prohibition had already been repealed.

In 1998, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit identified a second “Secretary of the Treasury” as a man by the name of Manual Díaz-Saldaña. See the definitions of “Secretary” and “Secretary or his delegate” at 27 CFR 26.11 (formerly 27 CFR 250.11), and the published decision in Used Tire International, Inc. v. Manual Díaz-Saldaña, court docket number 97‑2348, September 11, 1998. Both definitions mention Puerto Rico.

When all the evidence is examined objectively, IRS appears to be a money laundry, extortion racket, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 and 1961 et seq. (“RICO”). Think of Puerto RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act); in other words, it is an organized crime syndicate operating under false and fraudulent pretenses. See also the Sherman Act and the Lanham Act.

Obama Seeks To Double Tax Law Enforcement Budget



Ya.  Obama is going to save us.  No doubt about it.  People are being thrown out of their homes, losing their jobs at record rates, their retirement accounts are drying up, investments decimated and what does our glorious president do.  He doubles the budget of the IRS so they can do a better job of fleecing us.  

Oh by-the-way, did you know the IRS is not even a part of the U.S. Treasury, that it's an offshore corporation set up by the global banking cartels back in 1913, at the same time they set up the Federal Reserve banking fraud?   Check out this eye opening article 31 Questions and Answers About The IRS.  The purpose of the IRS was to ensure the interest payment they were to change the federal government for lending the government money.  Did you also know that the Federal Reserve isn't any more Federal than Federal Express?  Don't believe it.  Look up any Fed branch and you won't find it in the blue pages.  It's a totally private operation run by the global banking cartels.

* * * * * * * * * * * *

Reuters

President Barack Obama proposed on Thursday nearly doubling funds to enforce U.S. tax laws next year, with an aim of more than quadrupling funding for tax compliance to $2.1 billion within five years.

The budget plan seeks $12.1 billion for the Internal Revenue Service, responsible for collecting and enforcing individual and corporate tax laws, for fiscal 2010, which begins October 1. That amounts to a roughly 5.2 percent increase over the IRS budget for 2009, which was $11.5 billion.

The budget proposal, which must be approved by Congress, includes a $890 million request to boost tax enforcement, including in the international arena, an increase of $400 million from 2009.

Video: The Truth About The Fraud of the IRS by Attorney Tom Cryer



This is a video presentation by Attorney Tom Cryer was found not-guilty of failing to file and pay income taxes.   You will NOT see info about anyone successfully defeating the criminal operation of the IRS even though there are many, many cases.  All we hear about are the people who fail to defeat them.  AND, without exception, the people that loose are railroaded by the judges who refuse to allow people to present sufficient evidence to defend themselves.  There have even been judges that have said "I'm not going to allow the law in my courtroom!" in response to a defendant appeal to admit cases of legal precedent.
 Copyright © 2016 The Kick Them All Out Project
 All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners.
 Created this page in 0.44 seconds